Home >> blog >> Blog
GOP Leaders in States & Congress Unify in Suit Against Job-Killing Health Care Law
Posted by Press Office on December 01, 2010
Last night, in response to news reports that Liberty University’s lawsuit against the job-killing health care law’s individual mandate was dismissed, the White House’s blog compared those who have filed a legal challenge to the health care law to people who opposed “the Social Security Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Voting Rights Act,” stating that “challenges like this are nothing new.”  While legal challenges to laws Congress passes may be “nothing new,” the heart of the suit against ObamaCare - the burdensome individual mandate - is new, because it is an unprecedented power grab by the federal government that will diminish freedom and job-creation.   And unlike the Social Security Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Voting Rights Act, the job-killing health care law was passed through Congress on a highly partisan vote, and signed into law over the objections of a majority of the American people.

But Republicans aren’t standing by while Democrats implement their job-killing health care law.  Speaker-designate John Boehner (R-West Chester) and other GOP Congressional leaders are meeting with newly-elected Republican governors this afternoon to discuss “a collaborative effort” to “pick apart the health care law,” in addition to other pressing issues, like jobs and spending.   One joint approach the GOP has taken so far is a legal challenge to the job-killing health care law centered around the unconstitutional individual mandate, which is weaving its way through the courts now.  

As the New York Times reported on Saturday, the unconstitutional individual mandate may well prove ObamaCare’s undoing: 
As the Obama administration presses ahead with the health care law, officials are bracing for the possibility that a federal judge in Virginia will soon reject its central provision as unconstitutional and, in the worst case for the White House, halt its enforcement until higher courts can rule….Virginia’s attorney general, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, a Republican who filed the Richmond lawsuit, argues that if Judge Hudson rejects the insurance requirement he should instantly invalidate the entire act on a nationwide basis.

Mr. Cuccinelli and the plaintiffs in the Florida case, who include attorneys general or governors from 20 states, have emphasized that Congressional bill writers did not include a ‘severability clause’ that would explicitly protect other parts of the sprawling law if certain provisions were struck down.  An earlier version of the legislation, which passed the House last November, included severability language.  But that clause did not make it into the Senate version, which ultimately became law.  A Democratic aide who helped write the bill characterized the omission as an oversight.

Without such language, the Supreme Court, through its prior rulings, essentially requires judges to try to determine whether Congress would have enacted the rest of a law without the unconstitutional provisions....Lawyers for Virginia have sought to turn one of the federal government’s arguments on its head.  They note that the health law explicitly refers to the insurance requirement as ‘an essential part’ of the act’s regulatory scheme, and that Justice Department lawyers — in pressing their point that the law permissibly regulates commerce — have called it the ‘linchpin.’  If it is so essential, Virginia’s lawyers have asked, why should a judge believe that Congress intended for the rest of the act to stand without it?  

Any illusion that the cases are not highly politicized was lost when Republican leaders raced this month to file friend-of-the-court briefs in Pensacola, and Democrats responded with briefs from state legislators and supportive economists.  Among the Republicans intervening in the case are Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the future speaker; 32 United States senators; and Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, a possible presidential candidate.

As Boehner wrote in USA Today earlier this year, “This is the first time in American history that Congress has passed a law mandating that you buy something simply because you're breathing...If the federal government thinks it can get away with this kind of power grab, it will think it can do anything.”   With the Pledge to America, Republicans made clear their commitment to repeal the job-killing health care law and replace it with better solutions.  Republicans will continue standing with small businesses and fighting to repeal this job-killing law to give entrepreneurs the freedom and certainty they need to put Americans back to work.
Comments
The opinions expressed below are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily represent those of this office.
  • Stephen Noll commented on 12/2/2010
    Two issues need to be separated; the current plan's future and the actual immediate needs we have in health care. While time is a wasting things happen which can be critical problems for individuals.
  • Gary Adams commented on 12/8/2010
    As a Health Insurance Broker in the state of Idaho, I can appreciate the need for health care, but not mandated by the government. This law is a job-killing law. We have received notice that commissions will be cut to agents by as much as 50% because of the MLR that is buried in this law. I can't survive this kind of a cut in pay! Who Could? There are a lot of agents and agencies that will be out of business. Adding to the already terrible economy. A snowball effect on a lot of businesses because of this kind of a cut in earnings is going to be nationwide unless this Obamacare Law is repealed and the sooner the better!
  • Pat Berger commented on 12/8/2010
    I own 50% of a small printing firm Mercer Color Corporation in Coldwater Ohio. Our health care cost will increase 35% this year because of the Obama care requirements. There is no longer any affordable health care insurance. Our coverage for 7 families will go to $66,000.00. We have tried to implement self insurance, high deductible's, and all the other options available. We started our business in 1981 and went through the high interest of the early eighties and were still able to survive. Business is getting to the point of why? Why work your butt off? Why should I provide so many tax dollars for others to sit on their butt and enjoy a good life using my tax dollars? Why invest in new anything? Why should I provide jobs? Why am I penalised with so many payroll taxes by providing jobs? Why should I keep on doing what I am doing? I have made a commitment to all those that I have hired to provide with an opportunity to make it without government intervention. The problem is that with all the present government and regulation intervention in business it is very difficult to provide for those hired whom I have made a commitment too.
  • Elinor Dandrea commented on 12/8/2010
    Please stop anything, that forces Americans to purchase something they dont want. The Commerce Clause is being misused as an enforcement tool. Which it was never meant to become. This laws passing is trampling on our States rights. Please, make our Country live by its Constitution, What will government tell us to by next?
  • Paul Gilbert commented on 12/8/2010
    Noll's comment us completely off base. The "actual immediate needs we have in health care" have NOTHING to do with Government!!!
  • Andrea Talbot commented on 12/8/2010
    I have tried to read through the whole bill, but each item is so against good medical practices, that I get so disgusted at the way these people do their dirty deed I have to stop and regroup. Here's some food for thought. Perhaps their could be a five person committee made up of young medical interns and young legal interns within the congressional clerks that could take the bill on as an assignment to read it line by line and have a discussion and come up with a concensus to present to the Congress rather than having a standoff. Of course, they certainly would have to be nonpartial to either party. Their are some very brilliant young people without an agenda, and one of these days, they will be leading the country.
  • Lynn Rusconi commented on 12/12/2010
    I do believe the health care plan that would be most beneficial to the American people is the plan used by France. France is rated number one in the world for providing their citizens with good health care and is less costly than in the U.S..
Post a Comment
We encourage you to participate in the Ohio-08 Blog by commenting.
All comments are moderated. Comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory, contain personal attacks or obscenity, or are considered inappropriate will not be approved. We will make every reasonable effort to quickly review comments; however due to staffing constraints approval may require up to or beyond 24 hours.
You are fully responsible for any content that you post.


7969 Cincinnati-Dayton Road Suite B West Chester, OH 45069 (513) 779-5400 tel 
12 South Plum Street Troy, OH 45373 (937) 339-1524 
1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-6205